More lameolympics logo nonsense
The London 2012 dog's breakfast that is their dreadful logo continues to be the laughing stock of the world - it turns out now that the animated version had to be pulled from the official site because the animators didn't do a standard check to make sure the flickering wasn't in the danger zone that can trigger epileptic fits, with the result a number of people complained about being made ill by it. The arse they have made out of this simple job really doesn't speak well for the prospects for the actual organisation of the Olympics themselves.
Showing posts with label Olympics 2012. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Olympics 2012. Show all posts
Friday, June 8, 2007
Tuesday, June 5, 2007
The Lameolympics, Lisa Simpson and fellatio
Following on from the mountain of ridicule heaped on the godawful London 2012 Olympics logo (see the other day) I see many online are now referring to the jagged shape (supposedly inspired by the old Tiswas logo, but I think that's cobblers) as a silhouette of Lisa Simpson giving a blowjob. Well, the year spent designing that was well spent... Oh, wait, the idea was to promote the Olympics, not fellatio by comics characters, oops... Oh well, if they make cartoon bukkake an Olympic sport perhaps it might work out.
Following on from the mountain of ridicule heaped on the godawful London 2012 Olympics logo (see the other day) I see many online are now referring to the jagged shape (supposedly inspired by the old Tiswas logo, but I think that's cobblers) as a silhouette of Lisa Simpson giving a blowjob. Well, the year spent designing that was well spent... Oh, wait, the idea was to promote the Olympics, not fellatio by comics characters, oops... Oh well, if they make cartoon bukkake an Olympic sport perhaps it might work out.
Labels:
fellatio,
lameolympics,
logo,
Olympics 2012,
Simpsons
Monday, June 4, 2007
Lameolympics
I haven't been much of a fan of the idea of the London Olympics so far - frankly it is going to cost a fortune and a lot of hassle and I can't see it giving much to the rest of the country outside of London. Admittedly I'm not a big sports person to begin with, but since all the major new facilities (if they are built in time and work) will be in London they aren't going to be much use to trainee athletes around the rest of Britain, are they? And since they look certain to siphon off huge amounts of Lottery funding from arts group, local charity volunteers organisations and even local-level sports intitiatives to pay for this fiasco it looks like it may well hurt the encouragement of sports training in the UK, which is a huge own goal. Now they announce the lamest logo I have seen in years - it looks like something an amateur would have done around 1986 for smeg's sake. Given the millions the chancellor (soon to be Prime Monster) has indicated he will steal out of other much needed lottery funds to pay for all of this perhaps instead of this dire logo they should have an image of Gordon Brown's hand going into the collective wallet of the nation? I notice the BBC's poll of reader's views shows over 80% thinking it sucks like a hungry anteater.

I wonder how much money they wasted to come up with these pathetic designs? Never mind, perhaps Putin will have nuked us all before then. Assuming any of Russia's nuclear weapons he's threatening us with actually still work or even actually have a warhead inside since half of them aren't accounted for, probably because they sold them to rogue states and terrorists... Funny though, a dictatorial madman with a highly questionable human rights record, a history of aggression abroad, using fossil fuels to bully and intimidate others then threaten civilians with weapons of mass destruction - haven't we imposed sanctions and even gone to war for less than this in the recent past? Yet here we are with a few Western leaders just saying something weak such as "oh we'll have a talk with him at the G8..." and comments that his speech was "unhelpful." Unhelpful is refusing to co-operate with police to extradiate a suspect in a criminal case, telling millions you will point nuclear weapons at them is rather more than that; in fact its an act of terrorism.
I haven't been much of a fan of the idea of the London Olympics so far - frankly it is going to cost a fortune and a lot of hassle and I can't see it giving much to the rest of the country outside of London. Admittedly I'm not a big sports person to begin with, but since all the major new facilities (if they are built in time and work) will be in London they aren't going to be much use to trainee athletes around the rest of Britain, are they? And since they look certain to siphon off huge amounts of Lottery funding from arts group, local charity volunteers organisations and even local-level sports intitiatives to pay for this fiasco it looks like it may well hurt the encouragement of sports training in the UK, which is a huge own goal. Now they announce the lamest logo I have seen in years - it looks like something an amateur would have done around 1986 for smeg's sake. Given the millions the chancellor (soon to be Prime Monster) has indicated he will steal out of other much needed lottery funds to pay for all of this perhaps instead of this dire logo they should have an image of Gordon Brown's hand going into the collective wallet of the nation? I notice the BBC's poll of reader's views shows over 80% thinking it sucks like a hungry anteater.

I wonder how much money they wasted to come up with these pathetic designs? Never mind, perhaps Putin will have nuked us all before then. Assuming any of Russia's nuclear weapons he's threatening us with actually still work or even actually have a warhead inside since half of them aren't accounted for, probably because they sold them to rogue states and terrorists... Funny though, a dictatorial madman with a highly questionable human rights record, a history of aggression abroad, using fossil fuels to bully and intimidate others then threaten civilians with weapons of mass destruction - haven't we imposed sanctions and even gone to war for less than this in the recent past? Yet here we are with a few Western leaders just saying something weak such as "oh we'll have a talk with him at the G8..." and comments that his speech was "unhelpful." Unhelpful is refusing to co-operate with police to extradiate a suspect in a criminal case, telling millions you will point nuclear weapons at them is rather more than that; in fact its an act of terrorism.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)